Pages

Showing posts with label Patents. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Patents. Show all posts

Apple says Motorola patents are worth one dollar

A buck, a dollar, a single, a simolean, that’s all Apple thinks Motorola patents are worth. Apple and Motorola are going to have a contract trial next week, and head of that trial Apple has declared that it’s willing to pay Motorola one dollar in patent fees per iPhone. Apple has offered up the one dollar licensing fee for the iPhone to cover essential wireless patents used for cellular and Wi-Fi standards.

The court filing published this week from Apple’s legal team stated that the company was willing to pay the FRAND rate the court sets in the case going forward as long as that rate is less than or equal to one dollar per unit for worldwide sales. Apple notes in the court filing that should the licensing fees be more than that amount it reserves the right to exhaust all appeals and to refuse and proceed with further infringement litigation.

Apple is expected to get its wish too because the single Motorola expert witness in the case is unable to “testify about a particular rate at trial” according to the court. The court previously held that Motorola’s expert witness “did not offer any opinion about what particular rate or range or rates would constitute a FRAND royalty.”

One dollar certainly doesn’t sound like much, but considering how many iPhones Apple has sold is likely to add up to a large amount of money by most standards. We shouldn’t have to wait long to figure out if Apple’s request for one dollar per unit is agreed to. Do you think one dollar per iPhone is enough for essential patents, or is that too much?

The Apple court filing reads, “Apple’s actions in both licensing and litigation have matched its words in public. Because of that, Apple is willing to pay the FRAND [(fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory)] rate this Court sets going forward if that rate is less than or equal to $1 per unit for its worldwide sales of covered products… This is the rate that Apple believes is appropriate in these circumstances, a rate that flows from Apple’s articulated FRAND framework, and the only rate that can be supported by experts at this trial. To the extent the Court sets the rate higher than $1 per unit, Apple reserves the right to exhaust all appeals and also reserves the right available to any party offered a license: the right to refuse and proceed to further infringement litigation.”

[via Gizmodo]

Read more >>

Facebook, Yahoo Make Peace on Patents, Agree to Shared Ad Deals

Partner Handshake UPDATE: Yahoo and Facebook have put aside their escalating series of patent lawsuits and agreed to work together on future advertising deals.

The deal was sealed on a Friday morning call, AllThingsD reports, as part of the settlement to the companies’ patent dispute.

Yahoo posted the announcement on its website saying, “Yahoo! (NASDAQ:YHOO) and Facebook (NASDAQ:FB) today announced that they have entered into definitive agreements that launch a new advertising partnership, extend and expand distribution arrangements, and settle all pending patent claims between the companies.”

The announcement goes on to say the companies will work together to secure ads that will run on both sites, and further integrate sharing between the two sites: “Yahoo! and Facebook will also work together to bring Yahoo!’s large media event coverage to Facebook users by collaborating on social integrations on the Yahoo! site.”

The statement includes quotes from Yahoo’s interim CEO Ross Levinsohn (who may now be the CEO), and Facebook’s COO Sheryl Sandberg. Plus this fact: “Yahoo! has the largest active user base among all news sites that have integrated with Facebook’s Open Graph platform.”

No money will change hands, reportedly, but the companies will partner up on ad sales as well as cross-licensing of patents.

Yahoo CEO Scott Thompson, who initiated the patent lawsuit in March, stepped down in disgrace over his resume in May. Discussions on resolving the lawsuit started shortly after.

Since 2008, the company has cycled through four CEOs. Some speculate that the open position might be more appealing now that the patent fight has ended.

Both companies are eager to up their advertising dollars. Facebook’s April update to its IPO filing showed a drop in ad revenue. And GM caused a stir this year when it pulled ads from Facebook saying they were “ineffective.”

Yahoo has had major troubles of it own — staying relevant in the age of social media, especially now it has outsourced its search function to Bing. And the opportunity for a bigger slice of the ad pie is there: the first three months of 2012 showed online ad revenue industry-wide was the highest ever.

Are you glad that Yahoo and Facebook have set aside their differences? Does this bode well for other patent lawsuits, such as the longstanding battle between Apple and Samsung? Share your thoughts in the comments.

Read more >>
Next Post